|
Scripture Emerges from the Church's Life The New Testament was not handed down as a finished book but grew organically out of the Church's worship, preaching, and apostolic memory—"Scripture in Tradition" rather than Scripture separate from it. The earliest Christians relied solely on the Old Testament (in its Greek Septuagint form) as "Scripture," while the apostles' own writings and oral teaching were circulated and read aloud in local congregations but not yet called "Bible". St. Paul's first letters (c. 50-51 AD, likely Galatians or 1 Thessalonians) began this process, and the last books, including John's Gospel, his epistles, and Revelation, appeared by the end of the first century. Phases of Formation Orthodox scholarship typically divides the canon's growth into several overlapping phases:
The Decisive Fourth Century The pivotal moment came in 367 AD, when St. Athanasius of Alexandria, in his 39th Festal (Easter) Letter, listed exactly the 27 books that make up today's New Testament—the first time this precise list appeared anywhere. Athanasius did not invent this list but recorded what had already gained broad recognition through liturgical use and consensus among the churches, using the term "canonized" (κανονιζόμενα) for the first time in this context. Regional councils soon echoed this consensus: the Council of Laodicea (c. 363) listed nearly the same books (omitting Revelation), the Council of Hippo (393) was the first council to formally specify the 27-book canon for church reading, and this was reaffirmed at the Councils of Carthage in 397 and 419, with Augustine in attendance. An Orthodox Distinction: Recognition, Not Ratification Unlike Roman Catholicism, which later dogmatically defined its canon at the Council of Trent (1546), Orthodoxy has never had a single ecumenical council formally ratify the New Testament canon as a binding dogma. Instead, the Eastern Church accepted the 27-book canon gradually through the consensus of the Fathers and liturgical practice, a process further echoed in the Council in Trullo (692), which affirmed the Carthage canons, and later at the Synod of Jerusalem (1672), which addressed the canon more directly in response to Protestant and Catholic debates. This reflects a core Orthodox principle: the Church did not create the canon by external authority but discerned and recognized books already bearing the marks of apostolic origin, orthodoxy of teaching, and universal ("catholic") liturgical use across the churches. Simplified Timeline
Orthodox vs. Protestant Views The two agree on the final 27-book New Testament list but diverge sharply on why and how that list carries authority. Protestants hold to Sola Scriptura, the view that Scripture is self-authenticating and inherently authoritative because it is God-breathed, with the Church merely recognizing what was already true rather than conferring authority upon it. Orthodoxy teaches that Scripture emerged organically from within the Church's worshiping life and cannot be separated from Holy Tradition, meaning the Bible's authority is inseparable from the same Spirit-guided community (bishops, councils, liturgical use) that discerned and preserved it over centuries. This produces a practical difference in interpretation: Protestants generally trust the individual believer, aided by the Holy Spirit, to interpret Scripture directly, whereas Orthodoxy insists that Scripture must be read within the Church and corrected by patristic consensus, since the Bible was never intended to be interpreted by an individual alone but by the people of God as a community, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. A typical example is when Christ or the Apostles explain the Scriptures to others. Comments are closed.
|
Archives
August 2026
Categories |
SourcesAll the materials on this website are copyrighted by their respective authors.
|
About us"Bible Smart" is a ministry of Holy Cross Greek Orthodox Church of Farmington Hills, Michigan. It is used as a platform of learning for the Bible Study as well as Church School classes.
|
RSS Feed